Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DETROIT TRUST CO., Receiver of Detroit Aircraft Co., v. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO., Receiver of Lockheed Aircraft Co.; Wilbert J. AUSTIN v. TITLE INSURANCE ETC., CO., 1933 — 66 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
DETROIT TRUST CO., Receiver of Detroit Aircraft Co., v. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO., Receiver of Lockheed Aircraft Co.; Wilbert J. AUSTIN v. TITLE INSURANCE ETC., CO.
66 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DETROIT TRUST CO., Receiver of Detroit Aircraft Co., v. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO., Receiver of Lockheed Aircraft Co. Wilbert J. AUSTIN v. TITLE INSURANCE ETC., CO.
No. 7271.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 6, 1933.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeals in this cause dis-
missed; that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered according to stipulation canceling bonds and discharging parties to said bonds; mandate forthwith.