Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Park Rapids Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States, 1913 — 226 U.S. 605 · caselaw · US
General
Park Rapids Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
226 U.S. 605·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 100.
Park Rapids Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
Argued December 18, 1912.
Decided January 6, 1913
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on the authority of United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432, 436; act of Congressof April 21, 1904, c. 1402, 33 Stat. 189, 209; Heckman v. United States, 224 U. S. 413, 437, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
Mr. Ransom J. Powell and Mr. George T. Simpson for the plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Knaebel for the defendant in error.