Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas S. Parker, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes, Respondent, 1878 — 74 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas S. Parker, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes, Respondent
74 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas S. Parker, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes, Respondent.
(Argued June 10, 1878;
decided June 21, 1878.)
Reported below, 10 Hun, 531.
Rufus W. Peckham for appellant.
Matthew Hale for respondent. ,
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order, and for judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation, on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.