General
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States et al.; South Dakota et al. v. United States et al.; and Minnesota et al. v. United States et al.
359 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 552.
No. 620.
No. 633.
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States et al.; South Dakota et al. v. United States et al.; and Minnesota et al. v. United States et al.
Max Swiren and Richard,Musenbrock for appellant in No. 552. Phil Saunders, Attorney General of South Dakota, Her-mán L. Bode, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest W. Stephens for appellants in No. 620.
Miles Lord, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Harold J. Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants in No. 633.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for the United States- and the Interstate - Commerce Commission, appellees.
Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Harry R. Begley, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Illinois, appellee.
Starr Thomas and Edwin A. Lucas for the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., -appellees.
Robert H. Walker and Max J. Lipkin for Intervening Appellees.-
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District'of Minnesota. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 165 F. Supp. 893.