Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John B. Muzzy, as Receiver of George W. Copley, Respondent, v. Ernestus Gulick et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
John B. Muzzy, as Receiver of George W. Copley, Respondent, v. Ernestus Gulick et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
177 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John B. Muzzy, as Receiver of George W. Copley, Respondent, v. Ernestus Gulick et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Muzzy v. Ghiliek, 77 App. Div. 632, affirmed.
(Argued November 17, 1903;
decided January 12, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 22, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Myer Fussbcoum for appellants.
Flon Ii. Brown for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Haight and Werner, JJ.; Cullen, J., dissents on the ground that the deposition of the grantor in supplementary proceedings was improperly admitted in evidence as against grantee. Not voting: Parker, Ch. J., and "Vann, J.