Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas Gas Transmission Corp. et al. v. Shell Oil Co.; and Federal Power Commission v. Shell Oil Co., 1959 — 361 U.S. 811 · caselaw · US
General
Texas Gas Transmission Corp. et al. v. Shell Oil Co.; and Federal Power Commission v. Shell Oil Co.
361 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 167.
No. 170.
Texas Gas Transmission Corp. et al. v. Shell Oil Co.; and Federal Power Commission v. Shell Oil Co.
Mathias F. Correa for Texas Gas Transmission Corp., and Gavin H, Cochran for Louisville Gas & Electric Co. (Lawrence W. Keep-news of counsel), petitioners in No. 167. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Wayne G. Barnett, Samuel D. Slade, Willar'd W. Gatchell and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for petitioner in No. 170. William F. Kenney, Oliver L. Stone and George C. Schoenberger, Jr. for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 263 F. 2d 223.