Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Dickinson, Appellant, v. Mary E. Wilson et al., Respondents, 1874 — 56 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Dickinson, Appellant, v. Mary E. Wilson et al., Respondents
56 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Dickinson, Appellant, v. Mary E. Wilson et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 16, 1874;
decided April 28, 1874.)
The only questions presented in this case, arose on exceptions to the findings of fact by the court and to refusals to find; which were disposed of upon the evidence.
S. A. Underhill for the appellant.
J. M. Robertson for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.