Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harry Gleich, Respondent, v. Charles A. Cobb, as Administrator of the Estate of Jacob L. Cobb, Deceased, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 575 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Harry Gleich, Respondent, v. Charles A. Cobb, as Administrator of the Estate of Jacob L. Cobb, Deceased, Appellant
188 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry Gleich, Respondent, v. Charles A. Cobb, as Administrator of the Estate of Jacob L. Cobb, Deceased, Appellant.
(Submitted March 14, 1907;
decided April 2, 1907.)
Gleich v. Cobb, 110 App. Div. 918, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial'at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real property.
George V. Brower for appellant.
Herman G. Loew and George Tonkonogy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ. Not sitting : Willard Bartlett, J.