Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; and Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; and Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.
355 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 14, 1957.
No. 36,
No. 82,
October Term, 1956.
October Term, 1956.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; and Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.,
George Brus-sel, Jr. for Breswick & Co. et al., and Randolph Phillips, pro se, movants-appellees. Whitney North Seymour, David Hartfield, Jr. and Edward K. Wheeler filed a memorandum in opposition for the Alleghany Corporation, appellant in No. 36.
[MAJORITY]
353 U. S. 151. The motion of appellees Breswick & Co., Myron Neisloss and Randolph Phillips to retax costs is denied.