Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Missouri Kansas Texas Railroad Co. v. United States et al., 1980 — 449 U.S. 1005 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Missouri Kansas Texas Railroad Co. v. United States et al.
449 U.S. 1005·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 25, 1980
No. A-453.
Missouri Kansas Texas Railroad Co. v. United States et al.
[MAJORITY]
The order heretofore entered by Justice Powell on November 21, 1980, at 7 p. m.,' is vacated and the application for stay presented to Justice Powell, and by him referred to the Court, is denied. The application, filed November 22, 1980, at 12:05 p. m., for an order enjoining the effectiveness of the merger between Burlington Northern Inc. and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Co., is denied. Treating the application for a temporary stay as an application for stay of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari, the application for stay is denied.
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.