Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. Fisher, Appellant, v. The Rochester Gas Light Company et al., Respondents, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
General
George E. Fisher, Appellant, v. The Rochester Gas Light Company et al., Respondents
167 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Fisher, Appellant, v. The Rochester Gas Light Company et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 29, 1901;
decided May 14, 1901.)
Fisher v. Rochester Gas Light Co., 43 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 3, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at' Special Term.
Charles E. Patterson for appellant.
Hamilton Odell and William E. Stiger for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.