Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank Wolf, Respondent, v. John J. Devitt, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
General
Frank Wolf, Respondent, v. John J. Devitt, Appellant
179 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Wolf, Respondent, v. John J. Devitt, Appellant.
Wolf v. Deviti, 83 App. l)iv. 42, affirmed.
(Argued June 17, 1904;
decided October 25, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment entered May 19, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and granting a new trial and directed judgment in accordance with the verdict.
John E. Brennan for appellant.
Emerioh Kohn and Abraham Brekstone for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Vann, J.