Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1967 — 385 U.S. 647 · caselaw · US
General
FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
385 U.S. 647·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 702.
Decided January 23, 1967.
John W. Cooper for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hemly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express,.Inc., et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.