Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alberty, Trading as Alberty's Food Products, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1941 — 314 U.S. 630 · caselaw · US
General
Alberty, Trading as Alberty's Food Products, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission
314 U.S. 630·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 104.
Alberty, Trading as Alberty’s Food Products, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. W. I. Gilbert, Jr. and Charles H. Carr for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Charles H. Weston and W. T. Kelley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.