Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Dakota, Wyoming and Missouri River Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles D. Crouch et al., Trustees, 1906 — 203 U.S. 582 · caselaw · US
General
The Dakota, Wyoming and Missouri River Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles D. Crouch et al., Trustees
203 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 45 and 46.
The Dakota, Wyoming and Missouri River Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles D. Crouch et al., Trustees.
Argued for defendants in error and submitted for plaintiffs in error October 23, 1906.
Decided October 29, 1906.
Mr. Wm. T. Coad for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederick C. Bryan and Mr. Charles W. Brown for defendants in. error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the. Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179; Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U. S. 86; Mason v. United States, 136 U. S. 581; Grand Island &c. Railroad Company v. Sweeney, 103 Fed. Rep. 342; S. C., 95 Fed. Rep. 396; Sweeney v. Grand Island &c. Railroad Company, 61 Fed. Rep. 3; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269; Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Hughes, 191 U. S. 477; Telluride Power &c. Company v. Rio Grande &c. Railway Company, 175 U. S. 639; Telluride Power &c. Company v. Rio Grande &c. Railway Company, 187 U. S. 569; case below, 18 S. Dak. 540; 101 N. W. Rep. 722.