Contracts · MBE-tested

United States v. California

375 U.S. 990·Supreme Court of the United States·1964

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

January 20, 1964. No. 5, Original. United States v. California. Solicitor General Cox for the United States. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, for defendant. [MAJORITY] The joint motion of counsel for extensions of time to file pleadings and briefs is granted and the order of this Court of December 2, 1963, ante, p. 927, is amended to provide that the answer to the supplemental complaint shall be filed on or before March 2, 1964; additional exceptions to the Report of thé Special Master and briefs in support thereof shall be filed on or before April 1, 1964, and answering briefs shall be filed on or before May 15, 1964. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.