Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Seger-Thomschitz v. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; Franklin v. Tennessee; Riley v. Union Parish School Board et al.; Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham, North Carolina; Partovi v. Holder, Attorney General, et al.; Townsend v. Calderone et al.; McGlone v. Austin; Mattox v. Buss, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Soucy v. Barnhart, Warden; Hodge et ux. v. Calvert County, Maryland, et al.; Douglas v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Rafi v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Ellis v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Clark County, et al.; Barrino v. Department of the Treasury et al.; Polk v. Beeler, Warden, et al., In re Nesbitt, 2011 — 563 U.S. 970 · caselaw · US