Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Margaret Hudson, Appellant, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondent, 1879 — 77 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Margaret Hudson, Appellant, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondent
77 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Margaret Hudson, Appellant, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondent.
It is within the discretion of the Supreme Court to grant or xyithhold a common-law certiorari, and its discretion cannot be reviewed.
An unreasonable delay in applying for the writ may be a ground for refusing it, and for quashing it even after a hearing on the return thereto.
(Argued April 8, 1879;
decided April 25, 1879.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, dismissing a writ of certiorari brought to review the proceedings of defendant, dismissing William Hudson from the service of the department as a fireman.
It appeared that there was a lapse of about two years and a-half between the date of proceedings complained of and the application for the writ. Held, as above ; the court citing The People v. Hill (53 N. Y., 547); The People v. Stilwell (19 id., 531-533) ; The People v. The Mayor (2 Hill, 12, 13).
Douglas A. Levien for appellant.
D. J. Dean for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam mem.]
Per Curiam mem.
for dismissal of appeal.
All concur, Miller, J., absent.
Appeal dismissed.