Contracts · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Mechanics' Lien filed by Louis Cattaberry, as Claimant, Respondent, v. John A. Knox, Contractor and Owner, et al., Appellants
154 N.Y. 747·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Mechanics' Lien filed by Louis Cattaberry, as Claimant, Respondent, v. John A. Knox, Contractor and Owner, et al., Appellants.
Matter of Cattaberry v. Knox, 17 App. Div. 372, affirmed.
(Argued October 18, 1897;
decided November 23, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 14, 1897, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by claimant to set aside an order vacating and canceling a notice of lien filed by the claimant.
J. Homer Hildreth for appellants.
James A. Dunn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.