Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Railroad Retirement Board et al. v. Duquesne Warehouse Co.; and Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board et al., 1945 — 325 U.S. 848 · caselaw · US
General
Railroad Retirement Board et al. v. Duquesne Warehouse Co.; and Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board et al.
325 U.S. 848·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1324.
No. 1338.
Railroad Retirement Board et al. v. Duquesne Warehouse Co.; and Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board et al.
June 11, 1945.
Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Messrs. Myles F. Gibbons, Frank L. Mulholland, Clarence M. Mulholland and Willard H. McEwen for petitioners in No. 1324.
Messrs. George R. Allen, John S. Flannery and R. Aubrey Bogley for petitioner in No. 1338.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, respectively, granted.
Reported below: 148 F. 2d 473.