Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GOTTLEIB'S INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. The HARRIMAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The Bank of United States, and Chatham Phœnix National Bank & Trust Company, Appellees, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1062 · caselaw · US
General
GOTTLEIB'S INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. The HARRIMAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The Bank of United States, and Chatham Phœnix National Bank & Trust Company, Appellees
59 F.2d 1062·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GOTTLEIB’S INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. The HARRIMAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The Bank of United States, and Chatham Phœnix National Bank & Trust Company, Appellees.
No. 3258.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 29, 1932.
Biggs & Broughton, of Raleigh, N. C., and Charles L. Abernethy, of New Bern, N. C., for appellant.
Thompson & Wilson, of Elizabeth City, N. C., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Case dismissed under Rule 20 per agreement of counsel.