Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fulk et al. v. Moritz et al., 1983 — 460 U.S. 1075 · caselaw · US
General
Fulk et al. v. Moritz et al.
460 U.S. 1075·Supreme Court of the United States·1983
Justice Stevens and Justice O’Connor would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, and deny certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 18, 1983
No. 82-6257.
Fulk et al. v. Moritz et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Motion of appellant for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Judgment affirmed.
Justice Stevens and Justice O’Connor would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, and deny certiorari.