Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Ruth HAMILTON, Bankrupt; Samuel H. Draisin, Petitioner-Appellant, 1926 — 15 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Ruth HAMILTON, Bankrupt; Samuel H. Draisin, Petitioner-Appellant
15 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Ruth HAMILTON, Bankrupt; Samuel H. Draisin, Petitioner-Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 1, 1926.)
No. 51.
Petition to Revise Order of and Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Appeal from and petition to revise an order in bankruptcy entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
May & Jacobson, of .New York City, for petitioner and appellant.
George O. Arkin, of New York City, opposed.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, and, under petition to revise, order affirmed, with one bill of costs.