Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grit et al. v. Wolman et al., 1973 — 413 U.S. 843 · caselaw · US
General
Grit et al. v. Wolman et al.
413 U.S. 843·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-1139.
Grit et al. v. Wolman et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist and companion cases, and Sloan v. Lemon and companion case, ante, pp. 798, 805, 813, Mr. Justice White would reverse the judgment of the District Court.