General
Frank Traynor, Respondent, v. Charles E. Murtagh et al., Appellants
159 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Traynor, Respondent, v. Charles E. Murtagh et al., Appellants.
Traynor v. Murtagh, 10 App. Div. 627, affirmed.
(Argued April 26, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 25, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment of the late City Court of Brooklyn in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Ha/rris Wilson for appellants.
Henry A. Powell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not voting.