Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob W. Falk, Appellant, v. Norman S. Dike, Respondent, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob W. Falk, Appellant, v. Norman S. Dike, Respondent
171 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob W. Falk, Appellant, v. Norman S. Dike, Respondent.
People ex rel. Falk v. Dike, 71 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Argued June 13, 1902;
decided June 20, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 26, 1902, which reversed an order of Special Term discharging the relator, on habeas corpus proceedings, from the custody of the defendant, on the ground that said defendant was not the sheriff of the county of Kings.
Benjamin F. Tracy, Jerry A. Wernberg, Charles H. Hyde and Levi W. Naylor for appellant.
G. D. B. Hasbrouck, Joseph A. Burr and Ira Leo Bamberger for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Matter of Guden (171 N. Y. 529).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.