Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Steadman v. Securities and Exchange Commission; Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services et al. v. Florida Nursing Home Assn. et al.; Wood v. Wood; Caribe Trailer Systems, Inc., et al. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority et al.; Scarpelli v. Illinois; Oltersdorf v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Co.; Smith v. United States; Lee v. Law Offices of Alioto et al.; Outlaw v. Illinois; McDonald v. Tennessee; McDonald v. Draper, Judge; De Priest v. Bible, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Employment Security, et al.; Teng et al. v. United States; Kohls v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al.; Green v. Georgia; Hockenbury v. Sowders Penitentiary Superintendent; Davis v. Texas; Harris v. Spain, Judge, et al., 1981 — 451 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US