Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Winchester v. Jackson and others, 1806 — 7 U.S. 514 · caselaw · US
General
Winchester v. Jackson and others
7 U.S. 5143 Cranch 514·Supreme Court of the United States·1806
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Winchester v. Jackson and others.
Costs in error.
Costs will be allowed upon a dismissal of a writ of error, for want of jurisdiction, if the original defendant be also defendant in error.
The writ of error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the parties not appearing upon the record to be citizens of different states.
Campbell, for the defendants in error,
prayed that the dismissal might be with costs, the original defendants being also defendants in error.
The clerk stated that the practice had heretofore been to dismiss, without costs, where the dismission was for want of jurisdiction.
[MAJORITY]
The Couet directed it to be dismissed, with costs.