Contracts · MBE-tested
Mary E. Strong, Respondent, v. Emma Googins, Appellant
185 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary E. Strong, Respondent, v. Emma Googins, Appellant.
Strong v. Googins, 104 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
(Argued May 22, 1906;
decided June 5, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 6, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of t'wo parcels of real property.
Franklin Bien for appellant.
Allen McCulloh and Henry Hill Pierce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.