Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bates Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 1938 — 303 U.S. 628 · caselaw · US
General
Bates Manufacturing Co. v. United States
303 U.S. 628·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 647.
Bates Manufacturing Co. v. United States.
January 31, 1938.
Messrs. Charles B. Rugg, F. Brian Holland, and Warren F. Farr for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Morris, and Messrs. Sewall Key and F. E. Youngman for the United States. By leave of Court, Messrs. Theodore B. Benson and John Jennings, Jr. filed a brief on behalf of' Pinnacle Mills, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Petiton for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.