Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. First City National Bank of Houston et al., 1967 — 385 U.S. 1023 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. First City National Bank of Houston et al.
385 U.S. 1023·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 914.
United States v. First City National Bank of Houston et al.
Solicitor General Marshall on the application for stay and motion to advance.
David T. Searls for First City National Bank of Houston, Leon M. Payne for Southern National Bank of Houston, and Joseph J. O’Malley and Eugene J. Metzger for Acting Comptroller of the Currency Camp, in opposition to the motion for stay.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. S. D. Tex. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case placed on summary calendar. Motion to advance filed by the Solicitor General, and joined in by the .several appellees, granted. Case will be heard on the typewritten record with leave to the parties to print such portions of the record as they desire as appendices to their briefs.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.