Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Antonio Cappola, Plaintiff, v. Adolph Teitelbaum, Defendant. In the Matter of the Proceedings to Punish Adolph Teitelbaum, Appellant, for Contempt; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 540 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Antonio Cappola, Plaintiff, v. Adolph Teitelbaum, Defendant. In the Matter of the Proceedings to Punish Adolph Teitelbaum, Appellant, for Contempt; The People of the State of New York, Respondent
185 N.Y. 540·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Antonio Cappola, Plaintiff, v. Adolph Teitelbaum, Defendant. In the Matter of the Proceedings to Punish Adolph Teitelbaum, Appellant, for Contempt; The People of the State of New York, Respondent.
Matter of Teitelbaum, 84 App. Div. 351, modified.
(Argued April 16, 1906;
decided May 1, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 3, 1.903, which dismissed an appeal from an order of the court at a Trial Term adjudging the appellant herein guilty of criminal contempt, and affirmed an order of Special Term, denying a motion to vacate and set aside said order.
Max Schleimer and Abraham B. Schleimer for appellant.
William Framers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert S. Johnstone of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order of Appellate Division dismissing appeal from the order of the Trial Term punishing appellant for contempt modified so as to affirm said order, without costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs in this court. Appeal from order affirming order of Special Term dismissed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.