Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carrington v. Rash et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 902 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Carrington v. Rash et al.
380 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82.
Carrington v. Rash et al.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, on the motions.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Tex. (Certiorari granted, 379 U. S. 812.) Motion of respondent Carr to file reply brief and supplemental brief granted, said briefs having been lodged with the Court on February 10, 1965, and having been fully considered by the Court in the disposition of this case.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.