Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard B. Alexander, Plaintiff in error, v. Moses Graham, Defendant in error, 1843 — 42 U.S. 37 · caselaw · US
General
Richard B. Alexander, Plaintiff in error, v. Moses Graham, Defendant in error
42 U.S. 371 How. 37·Supreme Court of the United States·1843
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard B. Alexander, Plaintiff in error, v. Moses Graham, Defendant in error.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, in and for the county of Washington.
[MAJORITY]
The plaintiff in error having -filed an order in writing, directing the clerk tó dismiss this suit, it is thereupon now, here, considered, ordered, and adjudged by this court, that this writ of error be and the same .is hereby dismissed with costs.