Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Department of Public Works, etc., of the City of New York, Relative to the Opening of One Hundred and Eighty-first Street, between Tenth and Eleventh Avenues, 1891 — 126 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Department of Public Works, etc., of the City of New York, Relative to the Opening of One Hundred and Eighty-first Street, between Tenth and Eleventh Avenues
126 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Department of Public Works, etc., of the City of New York, Relative to the Opening of One Hundred and Eighty-first Street, between Tenth and Eleventh Avenues.
(Argued March 9, 1891;
decided April 14, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 29, 1890, which modified and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term vacating in part an order confirming report of the commissioners of estimate of assessment herein.
James A. Peering for appellant.
Peter B. Olney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.