Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brooks v. Tennessee, 1971 — 404 U.S. 955 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Brooks v. Tennessee
404 U.S. 955·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-5313.
Brooks v. Tennessee.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions III and IV, presented by the petition, which read as follows:
“III. The trial court was in error in refusing to allow defendant to be placed on the witness stand after other witnesses had testified in his behalf as said Tennessee Statute requiring defendant to be first witness is unconstitutional in violation of the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of Tennessee Constitution.
“IV. Code section 40-2403 deprives a defendant of due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
Reported below: — Tenn. App. —, — S. W. 2d —.