Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Philadelphia, Reading and New England Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Jacob S. Bowman, Respondent, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
The Philadelphia, Reading and New England Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Jacob S. Bowman, Respondent
163 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Philadelphia, Reading and New England Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Jacob S. Bowman, Respondent.
Philadelphia, P. cfi JV. E. B. B. Go. v. Bowman, 23 App. Div. 170, affirmed.
(Argued May 3, 1900;
decided May 22, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in. the second judicial department, entered January 10, 1898, affirming a judgment of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners appointed to determine the compensation to be made for real estate taken for railroad purposes under condemnation proceedings.
Milton Aj Fowler for appellant.
Robert F. WiUcinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.