Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pan American World Airways, Inc., v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al.; and United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 1964 — 376 U.S. 964 · caselaw · US
General
Pan American World Airways, Inc., v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al.; and United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
376 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 725.
No. 827.
Pan American World Airways, Inc., v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al.; and United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Jesse Freidin, Murray Gartner and Herbert Prashker for petitioner in No. 725. Louis Sherman, Joseph A. Sickles and Laurence J. Cohen for Building & Construction Trades Council et al.; and Roland C. Davis for Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, respondents in No. 725. Asher W. Schwartz and John F. O’Donnell for Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 725. Solicitor General Cox for the United States, as amicus curiae, in opposition in No. 725. Louis Sherman, Joseph A. Sickles and Laurence J. Cohen for petitioners in No. 827. Jesse Freidin and Herbert Prashker for respondent in No. 827.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.