General
Lorenzo HENNEFER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
75 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lorenzo HENNEFER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7566.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
March 11, 1935.
B. W. Oppenheim, J. M. Lampert, and J. B. Musser, all of Boise, Idaho, for appellant.
John A. Carver, U. S. Atty., E. H. Casterlin and Frank Griffin, Asst. U. S. Attys., and A. L. Freehafer, Atty., Department of Justice, all of Boise, Idaho, and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellee for dismissal of appeal, counsel for appellant not opposing said motion, ordered motion granted, appeal dismissed,' judgment of dismissal filed, and entered accordingly.