Administrative
Barnabas Hammett et al., Respondents, v. John J. Barnard et al., Appellants
62 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Barnabas Hammett et al., Respondents, v. John J. Barnard et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 21, 1875;
decided May 25, 1875.)
' This case presented simply questions of fact, the court holding there was evidence sufficient to authorize a submission thereof to the jury, and to sustain their verdict. (Reported below, 1 Hun, 198.) •
E. N. Taft for the appellants.
Richard H. Huntley for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Rapallo, J.,]
Rapallo, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.