General
Max Oberfelder, Respondent, v. National Distilling Company, Appellant
184 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Oberfelder, Respondent, v. National Distilling Company, Appellant.
Oberfelder v. National Distilling Co., 100 App. Div. 516, affirmed.
(Argued March 21, 1906;
decided April 6, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Harold H Bowman and Henry II. Bowman for appellant.
David Bandler, Ha/rry L. Haas and Henry Gottget/reu for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: 1 Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Willabd Babtlett and Chase, JJ.