Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STANDARD AUTOMATIC MACH. CO., Plaintiff Appellant, v. KARL KEIFER MACH. CO., Defendant Appellee (two cases), 1927 — 18 F.2d 331 · caselaw · US
General
STANDARD AUTOMATIC MACH. CO., Plaintiff Appellant, v. KARL KEIFER MACH. CO., Defendant Appellee (two cases)
18 F.2d 331·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STANDARD AUTOMATIC MACH. CO., Plaintiff Appellant, v. KARL KEIFER MACH. CO., Defendant Appellee (two cases).
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 7, 1927.)
Nos. 126, 127.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
C. L. Sturtevant, of Washington, D. C., and J. Stanley Churchill, of Boston, Mass., for appellant.
Alfred M. Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decrees (18 F.[2d] 326) affirmed, with costs.