Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GERENDE v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE, 1951 — 341 U.S. 56 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
GERENDE v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE
341 U.S. 5695 L. Ed. 2d 745·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Reed concurs in the result.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GERENDE v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE.
No. 577.
Argued April 9, 1951.
Decided April 12, 1951.
I. Duke Avnet and William H. Murphy argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brief were Harold Buchman and Mitchell A. Dubow.
Hall Hammond, Attorney General of Maryland, and /. Edgar Harvey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland the effect of which is to deny the appellant a place on the ballot for a municipal election in the City of Baltimore on the ground that she has refuséd to file an affidavit required by state law. Md. Laws 1949, c. 86, § 15. -Md.-, 78 A. 2d 660. The scope of the state law was passed on in Shub v. Simpson, - Md. -, 76 A. 2d 332. We read this decision to hold that to obtain a place on a Maryland ballot a candidate need only make oath that he is not a person who is engaged “in one way or another in the attempt to overthrow the government by force or violence,” and that he is not knowingly a member of an organization engaged in such an attempt. -Md. at-, 76 A. 2d at 338. At the bar of this Court the Attorney General of the State of Maryland declared that he would advise the proper authorities to accept an affidavit in these terms as satisfying in full the statutory requirement. Under these circumstances and with this understanding, the judgment of the Maryland Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Reed concurs in the result.