Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Lawlor, Appellant, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Respondent, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
James Lawlor, Appellant, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Respondent
168 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Lawlor, Appellant, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Respondent.
Lawlor v. Magnolia Metal Go., 58 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued October 7, 1901;
decided October 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Sujireme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 27, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
Cephas Erainerd, L. A. Gould and S. Viator Constant for appellant.
Alexander 8. Bacon for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.