Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George P. Rowell et al., Appellants, v. Joseph E. Janvrin, Respondent, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
George P. Rowell et al., Appellants, v. Joseph E. Janvrin, Respondent
138 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George P. Rowell et al., Appellants, v. Joseph E. Janvrin, Respondent.
(Submitted June 5, 1893;
decided June 20, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 12, 1893, which reversed an order of Special Term granting leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint and denying a motion for leave to amend.
Edward Hassett for appellants.
Dickinson W. Richa/rds for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.