Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank B. RICE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Frank B. RICE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
58 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank B. RICE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 4639.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 2, 1932.
Herbert Pope, Edwin J. Mosser, and Benjamin M. Price, all of Chicago, 111., and E. Barrett Prettyman, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, of Washington, D. C., and Dwight H. Green, of' Chicago, 111., for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel and file a stipulation of counsel, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties to the above entitled cause by their respective attorneys that the said cause be dismissed.
“Benjamin M. Price, “Attorney for Petitioner.
“Dwight H. Green, “Attorney for Respondent.” I
On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the petition for a review of the decision of the United States Board of'Tax Appeals filed therein in this cause on June 29, 1931, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.