Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew F. Dailey, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew F. Dailey, Appellant
143 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew F. Dailey, Appellant.
(Argued June 15, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 20, 1893, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Oyer and Terminer of the city and county of New York entered upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the third degree.
William F. Uowe for appellant.
John D. IAndsan/ for respondent.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 16.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.