Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Keels v. Central Railroad Company, 1892 — 147 U.S. 374 · caselaw · US
General
Keels v. Central Railroad Company
147 U.S. 37437 L. Ed. 208·Supreme Court of the United States·1892
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Keels v. Central Railroad Company.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina.
No. 1207.
Argued with No. 1206.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brown.]
Mr. Justice Brown.
As the facts of this case are substantially the same as the one just decided, the decision must be the same.
Mr. Samuel Lord, (with whom were, on the brief, Mr. D. A. Townsend, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, and Mr. Ira B. Jones,) for appellants.
Mr. Henry A. M. Smith, (with whom was Mr. J. T. Barron on the brief,) for appellee.
The decree .of the court below will, therefore, be reversed, and .the case remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill.