Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Froilan Miranda et al., Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company of the City of New York, Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
General
Froilan Miranda et al., Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company of the City of New York, Appellant
109 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Froilan Miranda et al., Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company of the City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued March 23, 1888;
decided April 10, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 26, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Osborn E. Bright for appellant.
Henry Thompson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.