General
Henderson, Hull & Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Harry McNally et al., Appellants
168 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henderson, Hull & Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Harry McNally et al., Appellants.
Hnclerson, Hull & Go. v. MaNally, 48 App. Div. 134, affirmed.
(Argued October 4, 1901;
decided October 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 20, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plain tiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Joseph A. Farley and Earley & Prendergast for appellants.
Theodore II. Friend and Henry Grasse for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the prevailing opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.